Google, Apple, Tesla, HP and other Silicon Valley firms imperiled by proposed Trump import tariffs and Republicans … – The Mercury News

That shiny new iPhone may say “assembled in China” on the back, but its origins are scattered around the world: wafers from Taiwan, modem chips and batteries from South Korea, displays from Japan, components from Europe and raw materials from Africa, Asia, Europe and the U.S.

Now that complicated supply chain may put Apple — the world’s most valuable company — in the bull’s eye as President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans consider sweeping import tariffs or a comprehensive border tax on incoming products, components and raw materials.

But while Apple has been singled out by Trump before, the administration’s actions would affect a who’s who of the Bay Area’s big name tech companies — which could see sales, revenue and access to global talent take a hit from new fees and the trade wars that could follow.

“It’s a real mess,” said Marcus Noland, senior vice president at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington, D.C., think tank that supports free trade.

Only two months into the Trump administration, it’s difficult to discern how an import tariff or border tax might take shape, but the president has said he wants to punish U.S. companies that make goods overseas to sell back home. Imposing new costs on imports would encourage domestic manufacturing and create jobs, Trump has argued.

While campaigning, Trump mentioned a 45 percent import tariff on goods from China and 35 percent on imports from Mexico. More recent reports suggested the Trump transition team was looking at a 10 percent fee. House Republicans, meanwhile, have proposed a 20 percent “border adjustment tax” covering all imports from all countries.

The list of firms with the most to lose from an aggressive new tariff or tax regime includes the valley’s biggest names: Google, Tesla, Oracle, HP, Cisco, Intel, Seagate, Western Digital, Nvidia, Marvell Semiconductor and more.

Also standing to lose? Consumers who will inevitably have the increased costs from import tariffs or a tax passed on to them, according to experts.

“You and I are going to pay for it,” said Georgia Tech professor John Vande Vate, who studies supply chains.

However, others believe imposing higher import costs would deliver significant benefits.

Northwestern University law professor Steven Calabresi last week said the proposed 20 percent border adjustment tax would “encourage Americans to buy American products” and “promote good jobs here in the United States” while raising $1 trillion over 10 years.

“It will allow us to cut income taxes, which discourage people from working. It is smart to discourage a little bit of the buying of foreign goods if you can then cut income taxes and get people back into the workplace or get them to work harder,” he said Thursday in an op-ed in The Hill.

Still, tariffs or a tax would also hit countries like China that export to the U.S., potentially leading to trade wars with nations whose markets and raw materials are critical to tech companies.

“If we decide to impose tariffs or high barriers to trade on our trading partners we should expect reciprocal trade barriers, which of course is not good for our industries, it’s not good for prices, and the whole thing spirals downward,” said Renee Bowen, a Stanford University Graduate School of Business professor who studies international trade.

Generally, when tariffs drive prices up, sales go down, said Rob Atkinson, president of the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, a tech-focused think tank.

The tech industry has long depended on a complex global network of suppliers, workers and materials. Apple, for example, noted in its most recent quarterly report that its manufacturing is concentrated among a small number of suppliers in Asia.

“Everything that is in our products comes from overseas,” Hewlett Packard Enterprise CEO Meg Whitman told CNBC in February. “That supply chain has taken 30 years to set up. So when all those components come in and are taxed, it’s not going to be good. This does not create jobs. It actually lowers the number of jobs for many, many companies.”

HP makes printers and PCs in China, while Cisco, Seagate and Western Digital manufacture products there and in Thailand, according to analyst Handel Jones of International Business Strategies in Los Gatos.

Google’s new Pixel phones are made by HTC in Taiwan, where Santa Clara’s Nvidia and Marvell Semiconductor buy chips that power products sold in the U.S. The Home virtual-assistance device by Google is made in China, and the company relies on Taiwanese firm Quanta to supply the servers that make it a cloud-services titan. Facebook also buys servers from Quanta, according to analysis firm Moor Insights & Strategy. Intel has fabrication and assembly plants in China, and assembly facilities in Malaysia and Vietnam.

It’s not just companies making tangible products that are at risk. Even a software-and-services company like Oracle is vulnerable to tariff-related retaliation, because it has invested heavily in providing IT services in China, where its clients include state-owned enterprises. The Chinese government, on top of potentially responding tit for tat to tariffs or taxes, could bar state-owned companies from doing business with U.S. firms, said the Peterson Institute’s Noland.

Companies that make some products in the U.S. won’t escape, either. They too would be vulnerable to an all encompassing import levy, such as the proposed border adjustment tax, because they use materials or parts from other countries.

While only Congress can levy across-the-board tariffs, a U.S. president has “limited authority” to impose tariffs in response to “special circumstances involving discrimination against U.S. exports or other unfair trade practices,” said John Veroneau, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who served as deputy U.S. trade representative under President George W. Bush. Trump has complained that other countries make the U.S. pay high tariffs and taxes on American products shipped overseas.

The president’s focus on China and Mexico targets two nations that play critical roles in the supply chains for major U.S. electronics firms, so high import tariffs aimed at those countries would “immediately disturb the supply networks,” Noland said.

Retaliatory tariffs would mean American companies could be faced with added costs for shipping high-end, U.S.-made components to China or Mexico for final assembly, before getting hit again when they import the assembled products back into the U.S., Noland said.

A full-blown trade battle with China could lead to a “supply chain war” in which the Asian nation bans exports to the U.S. of the metallic elements used in electronics manufacturing, which would “hurt U.S. electronics firms,” a September report from the Peterson Institute said.

China could potentially ban the sale of specific American tech products, claiming security issues and saying, for example, “You can’t sell Apple phones in China, because we’re worried about — and then they’d make something up,” Georgia Tech’s Vande Vate said.

Conflict between the U.S. and China over trade could spread to other areas, potentially affecting American firms’ access to Chinese talent, Noland said.

“A trade war that started with products,” Noland said, “could spill into things like visas and immigration issues, which would disadvantage the entire high tech sector.”

___________________________________________________________

Other threatened companies and their products

  • Tesla has a long-term contract to buy lithium mined in Mexico for the batteries it makes domestically.
  • Cisco announced last year it was expanding manufacturing in Mexico, where it has operated since 1993.
  • HP has production facilities in Mexico, according to market-intelligence firm BNamericas.
  • Bay Area companies SanDisk and Intel are among semiconductor companies make chips domestically that are sent to Asia to be wired up for installation onto circuit boards that are imported back to the U.S., according to Georgia Tech professor John Vande Vate.

 

Comments

Write a Reply or Comment:

Your email address will not be published.*