The Just Plain Fiction Election – The Ringer (blog)
With every twist, every news break, every scandal and rumor and â€œhereâ€™s what the electoral map would look like if only the section of the Deadwood cast that worked at the saloon votedâ€ zombie-irony simulation, there is one fundamental (if hacky) conclusion we seem to keep coming back to during this election cycle: that you couldnâ€™t make it up if you tried.
Which, of course hasnâ€™t stopped people from trying.
And in the spirit of our current (if finally winding down) Stranger Than Fiction ElectionÂ â€¦ we thought weâ€™d put this notion to the test: What if we had our very own Just Plain Fiction Election? Ten fictional presidential candidates, from nine fictional movies or TV showsâ€Šâ€”â€Špitted against one another in a fight to the elective death.
Here are the rules: four categories, weighted equally, with points awarded based on placement within each category.
And here are the candidatesâ€Šâ€”â€Š10 fictional presidents who have been through a full* election cycle:
David Palmerâ€Šâ€”â€Š24 (Dennis Haysbert)
Frank Underwoodâ€Šâ€”â€ŠHouse of Cards (Kevin Spacey)
Fitzgerald Grant IIIâ€Šâ€”â€ŠScandal (Tony Goldwyn)
Selina Meyerâ€Šâ€”â€ŠVeep (Julia Louis-Dreyfus)
Andrew Shepherdâ€Šâ€”â€ŠThe American President (Michael Douglas)
Jed Bartletâ€Šâ€”â€ŠThe West Wing (Martin Sheen)
Matthew Santosâ€Šâ€”â€ŠThe West Wing (Jimmy Smits)
Joe Bauersâ€Šâ€”â€ŠIdiocracy (Luke Wilson)
Mays Gilliamâ€Šâ€”â€ŠHead of State (Chris Rock)
Jack Stantonâ€Šâ€”â€ŠPrimary Colors (John Travolta)
[*So, for exampleâ€Šâ€”â€ŠHarrison Fordâ€™s President James Marshall: great performance, great president, no election in Air Force One, not on the list.]
And thatâ€™s really it. We have our presidents, we have our rules, and we have our collective national death spiral into the absurd.
This is the 2016 Fictional Presidential Election. Letâ€™s fight.
Category No. 1: Skeletons inÂ Closet
â€œSkeletons in closetâ€ may be more of a fringe concern in IRL presidential politics, but in fictional presidential politics itâ€™s no. 1 with a bullet. Becauseâ€Šâ€”â€Šand not to disillusion youâ€Šâ€”â€Šhere is the cold, hard truth: Most fictional presidents have seen some things, and done some things. And sometimes those things canâ€™t be undoneÂ â€¦ and canâ€™t be unseen.
For our 10-president candidate pool, the â€œskeletons in closetâ€ category can be broken down into four tiers, with points awarded within each tier (fewer skeletons means more points):
Tier 1 is the â€œskeletons-freeâ€ tier. These are the candidates who are good people without qualification, and have nothing to hide. (Although having nothing to hide is also, in its own way, a little creepy? But Iâ€™m sure itâ€™s fine.) These candidates are squeaky clean, making them immune to even the most vicious opposition research. If you support a candidate from this tier, then you can rest assured that, come election time, there will be no scandal, or -gate, or October Surprise, unless you consider a nice romantic dinner a surprise, it would be nothing fancy, just an incredible meal and a nice bottle of wine at your favorite restaurant, theyâ€™re closed tonight but the chef, heâ€™s a friend, is reopening with a limited menu as a personal favor, so it could be just the two of us, having some Us Time, no phones, no emails, no texts, actually this one text I just got is important but after that no texts, no kids, no work, none of that, you look so beautiful tonight, I hope these roses are enough, I grew them myself, in this little garden that I built from scratch, it was no big deal, itâ€™s just a garden that I built from scratch to grow roses in for you, â€œYou have a green thumb,â€ people keep telling me, and I tell them, â€œItâ€™s not my thumb thatâ€™s green; itâ€™s my heart,â€ I donâ€™t know, thatâ€™s just something I thought of to say.
The two candidates in Tier 1 are Matthew Santos (9 points) and David Palmer (10 points). Santos is a product of The West Wingâ€™s late-period â€œfuck it, letâ€™s spend this syndication money on Jet Skis and make the president a perfect personâ€ era, while Palmer isâ€Šâ€”â€ŠI mean, look: David Palmer found out that his son WAS AN ACTUAL MURDER SUSPECT, IN THE MIDDLE OF AN ACTUAL PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN, and his response was to preemptively come clean. Also he got shot and died and people probably went through his closet looking for skeletons and also searched his Gmail for the phrase â€œskeletons in my closet,â€ and Iâ€™m pretty sure no one ever mentioned finding anything.
Tier 2 is the â€œflawed a normal amountâ€ tier. These are the candidates who are basically good people, but whoâ€Šâ€”â€Šlike any other basically good personâ€Šâ€”â€Šmay have hidden a little multiple sclerosis from a few hundred million American citizens in a crazed bid for eternal power.
This tier of candidates is probably the closest to what we imagine a â€œnormal personâ€ to be, on the morality scaleâ€Šâ€”â€Šand I suppose there is some comfort in â€œnormal.â€ But at the same time: There are flaws here, pure and simple, and an opponentâ€™s opposition research may expose them. If you support a candidate from this tier, then you can feel good about yourselfÂ â€¦ but you also can count on a few surprises. Such is the gift and the curse of the human element.
The four candidates in this tier are Jed Bartlet, Mays Gilliam, Joe Bauers, and Andrew Shepherd. Jed Bartlet lied about having MS and covertlyâ€Šâ€”â€ŠIâ€™ll say it: shadilyâ€Šâ€”â€Šgreen-lit the assassination of the Qumari minister of defense (5 points). Joe Bauers escaped from prison and bribed a lawyer named Frito (8 points). Mays Gilliam resorted to smear campaigning, a classic indicator of having something to hide (6 points). And Andrew Shepherd seems clean but itâ€™s 50/50 he did some advanced-level Snowden shit to get Annette Beningâ€™s phone number (7 points).
Tier 3 is the â€œstandard bad person who would get into politicsâ€ tier. These are your everyday assholes, your run-of-the-mill â€œdonâ€™t tag me in that photo, please, fellow 19-year-old, Iâ€™m running for president somedayâ€ deviant-cynics. If you support a candidate from this tier, then you probably wonâ€™t feel great about yourselfÂ â€¦ and yet: Maybe thatâ€™s the point.
The three candidates in this tier are Jack Stanton (3 points), Selina Meyer (4 points), and Fitzgerald Grant (2 points). Jack Stanton unintentionally induced Kathy Batesâ€™s suicide by having no morals. Selina Meyer once said, â€œYouâ€™re going to cancel this recount like Anne Frankâ€™s bat mitzvah.â€
And Fitzgerald GrantÂ â€¦ [deepest WASPiest breath]Â â€¦ rigged an electronic voting machine to fix the presidential election in his favor. Had an â€œOval Office and chillâ€â€“level-brazen affair with his communications director, then said â€œIDK TBHâ€ when asked if his pregnant internâ€™s baby was his. Didnâ€™t not order the torture of his ex-mistressâ€™s newish boyfriend. Cried disingenuously a lot.
But mostly? He was the bad guy in Ghost and I donâ€™t fucking trust him.
And finally, thereâ€™s Tier 4: the â€œtossed Kate Mara like a horseshoe in front of a moving trainâ€ tier. These are the candidates (Frank Underwood, 1 point) who tossed Kate Mara like a horseshoe in front of a moving train.
If you support a candidate from this tier, then you support the center-leftâ€™s burgeoning antiâ€“Kate Mara movementâ€Šâ€”â€Šand thatâ€™s between you and your god.
Category No. 2: CampaignÂ Prowess
Can you survive being a bad person in fictional presidential politics? Yes. But can you survive being a badÂ â€¦ campaigner in fictional presidential politics? Actually yeah, definitely, 100 percent. But that doesnâ€™t mean itâ€™s not important. Hereâ€™s how our 10 candidates stack up when it comes to issue precision, voter connection, debate performance, kissing babies, giving speeches, holding hands, making plans, and so onâ€Šâ€”â€Šthe seams of inside baseball that hold a fictional presidential candidacy together:
10. Fitzgerald Grant III (1 point) is the worst fictional campaigner in history. Heâ€™s a worse campaigner than Joe Bauersâ€Šâ€”â€Šwho never had to campaign. Heâ€™s a worse campaigner than Selina Meyerâ€Šâ€”â€Šwho is the only president on this list who actually lost an election, and lost twice, including once as an incumbent. Heâ€™s worse than the â€œplaying out the stringâ€â€“seasons 24 presidentsâ€Šâ€”â€Šwhose collective platform essentially amounted to, â€œ25th Amendment, bitches.â€ Heâ€™s worse than everyone.
Why? Well, because Fitz just doesnâ€™t care. He honestly, from the bottom of his hot, dumb, nepotism-addled heart, just doesnâ€™t care about politics. All Fitz cares about is being in love.
As a person, thatâ€™s (maybe, IDK, itâ€™s still pretty annoying) admirable. But as a candidateâ€Šâ€”â€Šitâ€™s flat-out irresponsible.
9. Joe Bauers (2 points): Made the classic jump from mediocre Army librarian to faulty government experiment to prisoner awaiting trial in mentally degraded dystopia to escaped convict to interior secretary to death-row inmate with â€œdie by monster-truck demolition derbyâ€ sentence to vice president to presidentâ€Šâ€”â€Šand made it without running a single campaign. Beyond impressive, but the meaning is the same: As a political gladiator, Bauers is untested.
8. Selina Meyer (3 points)
7. Andrew Shepherd (4 points): Almost simultaneously blew a 63 percent approval rating and his relationship with Annette Bening:
But then didnâ€™t, because:
6. Mays Gilliam (5 points): The â€œwins outsider campaign by telling it like it isâ€ tropeÂ â€¦ maybeÂ â€¦ hasnâ€™t aged so well. But in 2003? It plays.
5. Jed Bartlet (6 points): Was always characterized as a great campaigner, and I donâ€™t doubt it. But honestly, I think this needs to be said: The competition in both Bartlet elections was weak. In the â€™98 primary, Bartlet beat John Hoynes, a supposedly formidable â€œbroad-appealâ€ Democrat whom [Sorkin voice] even Republicans loved. This was considered a huge upset at the time, and is where Bartlet burnished much of his â€œcampaign sharkâ€ reputation. But knowing what we know now about Hoynes (i.e., that heâ€™s a walking scandal, and more or less the West Wing universe version of a proto-haircut John Edwards)? The victory loses a lot of its luster. (Maybe think of Bartlet d. Hoynes as, like, an early-season win by a middle-of-the-pack team over a top-ranked team in college football. Looks greatÂ â€¦ until the top-ranked team then loses three more games in a row. Sometimes a Big Win doesnâ€™t stay a big win. Sometimes it turns out the Big Opponent just sucks.)
As for Bartletâ€™s pair of general elections: His â€™98 opponent is never even mentioned. And his â€™02 opponentÂ â€¦ wellÂ â€¦
Lookâ€Šâ€”â€ŠIâ€™m not saying Bartletâ€™s a bad campaigner. Heâ€™s world-class. Heâ€™s smart, and confident, and likable, and thoughtful, and easily the superior debater in this field. Heâ€™s top five all time, and I feel great about that. But the Bartlet campaign recordÂ â€¦ Iâ€™m sorry: It just isnâ€™t impressive. Strength of schedule matters. And he beat up on some pretty small schools.
4. Jack Stanton (7 points):
3. Matthew Santos (8 points): Won the presidency as a no-name congressman.
2. Frank Underwood (9 points): I feel totally confident that Frank Underwood wouldâ€Šâ€”â€Šsomehow, someway, you probably wouldnâ€™t survive, donâ€™t worry Iâ€™d make sure your gravestone read â€œPolitics, Baby!â€ in cursiveâ€Šâ€”â€Šfind a way to win an election against everyone on this list. And I suppose, by that metric, there is a strong case for Underwood at no. 1.
But I canâ€™t do it. And I canâ€™t do it becauseÂ â€¦
1. David Palmer (10 points): David Palmer won the California primary (and subsequent presidential election) while overcomingâ€Šâ€”â€Šholy shit, the first season of 24 was amazingâ€Šâ€”â€Šan assassination plot, a murder investigation, a kidnapping, a divorce, a faking of his own death, AND HAVING TO PRETEND WITH A STRAIGHT FACE THAT â€œCTUâ€ IS A REAL THING THAT REALLY EXISTS REALLY FOR REAL. Thatâ€™s astonishing. No one has ever done that before.
David Palmer is our greatest fictional presidential campaigner.
Category No. 3: Wildly Informal Ringer StaffÂ Poll
Members of the Ringer staff were asked to cast their votes for a presidential ticket from within the given candidate pool: a president (two vote-units), and a vice president (one vote-unit). Here are those results:
David Palmerâ€“Selina Meyer (Katie Baker)
Jed Bartletâ€“Selina Meyer (Caitlin Blosser)
Selina Meyerâ€“Mays Gilliam (Carl Brooks Jr.)
David Palmerâ€“Jack Stanton (Danny Chau)
Jed Bartletâ€“Andrew Shepherd (Kevin Clark)
Selina Meyerâ€“Andrew Shepherd (K. Austin Collins)
Jed Bartletâ€“Joe Bauers (Jason Concepcion)
Selina Meyerâ€“Fitzgerald Grant (Allison P. Davis)
Jed Bartletâ€“Andrew Shepherd (Amanda Dobbins)
Selina Meyerâ€“Andrew Shepherd (Sam Donsky)
Jack Stantonâ€“â€œNo VP. Stanton rides alone.â€ (Sean Fennessey)
David Palmerâ€“Fitzgerald Grant (Sam Fortier)
Andrew Shepherdâ€“Joe Bauers (Tate Frazier)
Jed Bartletâ€“Mays Gilliam (Rob Harvilla)
Matthew Santosâ€“Selina Meyer (Alison Herman)
Matthew Santosâ€“Mays Gilliam (Kate Knibbs)
Jed Bartletâ€“Joe Bauers (Zach Kram)
Andrew Shepherdâ€“Jed Bartlet (Juliet Litman)
David Palmerâ€“Jed Bartlet (Riley McAtee)
Selina Meyerâ€“Frank Underwood (Claire McNear)
David Palmerâ€“Matthew Santos (Haley Oâ€™Shaughnessy)
Jed Bartletâ€“Frank Underwood (Micah Peters)
Frank Underwoodâ€“Selina Meyer (Mallory Rubin)
David Palmerâ€“Selina Meyer (Chris Ryan)
David Palmerâ€“Mays Gilliam (Sam Schube)
Matthew Santosâ€“Fitzgerald Grant (Megan Schuster)
David Palmerâ€“Selina Meyer (Lindsay Zoladz)
RANKINGS: t8. Grantâ€Šâ€”â€Š3 votes (2 points), t8. Bauersâ€Šâ€”â€Š3 votes (2 points), t8. Stantonâ€Šâ€”â€Š3 votes (2 points), t6. Gilliamâ€Šâ€”â€Š4 votes (4.5 points), t6. Underwoodâ€Šâ€”â€Š4 votes (4.5 points), 5. Santosâ€Šâ€”â€Š7 votes (6 points), 4. Shepherdâ€Šâ€”â€Š8 votes (7 points), t2. Bartletâ€Šâ€”â€Š16 votes (8.5 points), t2. Palmerâ€Šâ€”â€Š16 votes (8.5 points), 1. Meyerâ€Šâ€”â€Š17 votes (10 points)
Category No. 4: Intangibles
And finally: intangibles.
When it comes to presidential politics, â€œintangiblesâ€ have historically been affirmed by the results of one famous, often mystical metric: the â€œWhich candidate would you most want to have a beer with?â€ Test. Here is that test, applied to our 10 candidates:
10. Fitzgerald Grant (1 point)
Having a drink with Fitz would have its pros and its cons.
Pros: You would drink some of the worldâ€™s best scotch. Also, you would drink some of the worldâ€™s best scotch.
Cons: Literally everything else.
First, he would pour your drinks on a silver platter, like youâ€™re at a banquet in Narnia, or at the silver platter store. This would take about 10 minutesâ€Šâ€”â€Šas he would have to pour using some special, semi-secret, old-timey method with a long dumb name. â€œOK if I give these an Oxford Platinum Traditional pour?â€Šâ€”â€Šand Iâ€™m thinkingÂ â€¦ hmmÂ â€¦ New England style?â€ he would ask, and then you would say, [it wouldnâ€™t matter what you would say].
Then, when he finally brought over the drinks, he would make a note about what kind of scotch it was, and how old:
Wow please stop.
Actually impeach yourself.
9. Jed Bartlet (2 points)
8. Matthew Santos (3 points)
I love The West Wing, but is it the worst drinking show ever? The West Wing is like Bizarro Cheers: I am not sure I would want to get a drink with any of the main characters on it.
Letâ€™s run through this list:
Leo McGarry: Doesnâ€™t drink.
Mandy Hampton: Worst.
Arnold Vinick: Under no circumstances.
Will Bailey: I would agree to drinks and then reschedule at the last minute and then stay stressed for the next week about how close drinks were to happening.
Jed Bartlet: Itâ€™s not something I would do.
Kate Harper: Dated Will, so, no.
Josh Lyman: For a large fee.
Donna Moss: For a smaller but still large fee.
Matthew Santos: Wouldnâ€™t enjoy myself but Iâ€™d manage.
Abbey Bartlet: Could see it going downhill fast but might be fine.
Toby Ziegler: In one very specific mood I get in sometimes, possibly.
Annabeth Schott: In one very specific mood I get in sometimes, possibly.
Sam Seaborn: 50/50.
Charlie Young: Sure.
C.J. Cregg: I would get a drink with C.J. Cregg.
7. Frank Underwood (4 points)
I see a night out drinking with Frank playing out approximately like this: First, he would offer you some champagne.
You would tell him thanks, but no more bullshitâ€Šâ€”â€Šyou know Doug keeps a bottle of Old Darby lying around.
He would tell you no, thatâ€™s Dougâ€™s private stash, it wouldnâ€™t be right, and then he would calmly turn to the camera and whisper, â€œThe goldfish must always respect the fish tankâ€™s wallsâ€Šâ€”â€Šthatâ€™s how it knows itâ€™s wet.â€
You would compromise and split a bottle of Snapple, one-third emptied and refilled with bottom-grade bourbon. At the end of the night you would play four rounds of Russian roulette and no one would die.
6. David Palmer (5 points)
5. Joe Bauers (6 points)
The two most important qualities in a drinking buddy:
(1) An ineluctable inner sadness.
(2) An ineluctable outer sadness.
4. Jack Stanton (7 points)
Also, while weâ€™re here:
My â€œwould you want to have a beer with them?â€ Mount Rushmore: (4) Bill Clinton (BOCANEGRA HIVE), (3) Ronald Reagan (Old Hollywood stories), (2) Barack Obama (my almost-favorite things: basketball and Guinness), (1) Lyndon Johnson (my favorite things: JFK conspiracy theories and Lone Star).
3. Andrew Shepherd (8 points)
2. Mays Gilliam (9 points)
2003 Chris Rock.
1. Selina Meyer (10 points)
And there you have it. It wasnâ€™t an easy race, and it wasnâ€™t a perfect race, andâ€Šâ€”â€Šlook: Kate Mara had to die. But it was a fair raceÂ â€¦ and in a fictional democracy, thatâ€™s whatâ€™s fictionally important.
10. Fitzgerald Grant (6 points)
9. Joe Bauers (18 points)
8. Frank Underwood (18.5 points)
7. Jack Stanton (19 points)
6. Jed Bartlet (21.5 points)
5. Mays Gilliam (24.5 points)
t3. Andrew Shepherd (26 points)
t3. Matthew Santos (26 points)
2. Selina Meyer (27 points)
1. David Palmer (33.5 points)
Congratulations to our winnersâ€Šâ€”â€Ša deeply American blend of insurance sales and narcissism, of baritone silence and â€œthatâ€™s like trying to use a croissant as a fucking dildo.â€ He got shot in Season 5, and she got fired. But politics is about second chancesâ€Šâ€”â€Šand fictional politics is about whatever chance comes after that. Congratulations to President David Palmer and Vice President Selina Meyer: our official Ringer 2016 Fictional Presidential Ticket. Itâ€™s the ticket we wantâ€Šâ€”â€Šand the ticket we deserve.
Write a Reply or Comment:
You must be logged in to post a comment.