In her new campaign memoir, What Happened, Hillary Clinton reveals that she has followed â€œevery twist and turn of the story,â€ and â€œread everything I could get my hands on,â€ concerning Russiaâ€™s role in the 2016 presidential election. â€œI do wonder sometimes about what would have happened if President Obama had made a televised address to the nation in the fall of 2016 warning that our democracy was under attack,â€ she writes.
Clinton has had a lot to take in. Since Election Day, the controversy over alleged Russian meddling and Trump campaign collusion has consumed Washington and the national media. Yet nearly one year later there is still no concrete evidence of its central allegations. There are claims by US intelligence officials that the Russian government hacked e-mails and used social media to help elect Donald Trump, but there has yet to be any corroboration. Although the oft-cited January intelligence report â€œuses the strongest language and offers the most detailed assessment yet,â€ The Atlantic observed that â€œit does not or cannot provide evidence for its assertions.â€ Noting the â€œabsence of any proofâ€ and â€œhard evidence to back up the agenciesâ€™ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack,â€ The New York Times concluded that the intelligence communityâ€™s message â€œessentially amounts to â€˜trust us.â€™â€ That remains the case today.
The same holds for the question of collusion. Officials acknowledged to Reuters in May that â€œthey had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far.â€ Well-placed critics of Trumpâ€”including former DNI chief James Clapper, former CIA director Michael Morrell, Representative Maxine Waters, and Senator Dianne Feinsteinâ€”concur to date.
Recognizing this absence of evidence helps examine what has been substituted in its place. Shattered, the insider account of the Clinton campaign, reports that â€œin the days after the election, Hillary declined to take responsibility for her own loss.â€ Instead, one source recounted, aides were ordered â€œto make sure all these narratives get spun the right way.â€ Within 24 hours of Clintonâ€™s concession speech, top officials gathered â€œto engineer the case that the election wasnâ€™t entirely on the up-and-up.â€¦ Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.â€